Banks restrict third-party AI agents' access to customer accounts

For the CISO of a retail bank

Morgan Stanley has begun blocking third-party AI agents from its platforms, and JPMorgan, Bank of America and Citi are also restricting them, Axios reported on Oct. 22, citing people familiar with the decisions.1

Axios reported, citing people familiar with the issue, that concerns about agents with login access are at the root of the decision by several banks to restrict third-party AI agent access, and that banking executives fear what such agents might do, especially if a user has granted purchase authority or the ability to shift funds.1 Axios also reported that some banks have tracked agents contacting call centers or appearing to act independently of user instructions, according to people familiar with the matter.1

Many banks cannot tell whether agent activity is user-directed, Axios reported, and one bank executive said they struggle to tell whether an agent was authorized by a user or has gone rogue.1

Axios reported that most banks have authorized, or are moving toward allowing, read-only access, which lets agents see customer financial information without acting; banks already grant similar access to apps such as Quicken.1

A Chase spokesperson said customers should not give their usernames and passwords to anyone, and a Morgan Stanley spokesperson said the bank has not observed instances of "rogue AI agents accessing our platforms."1

PYMNTS reported on Oct. 19 that JPMorganChase, Citigroup, Bank of America and Charles Schwab all said outside agents cannot move customer money; at JPMorganChase, agents authorized through a connector such as Plaid can see balances but cannot send money or pay bills, and the bank gave no timeline for changing that.2

Why it matters

Customers can give an agent their credentials, but bank terms and login systems cannot yet separate a sanctioned agent from a rogue one. Banks that allow agent access will need to settle who is liable for a disputed transfer, and until then read-only access is the common limit.

What’s next

PYMNTS reported that Bank of America is limiting agents' access to consumer deposits while it writes protocols that decide which party is liable for a payment an AI authorizes, and is working with AI agent developers on protocols for how an agent may interact with a customer account; the source did not give a date for completing them.2

From the brief

Our take. Morgan Stanley blocks third-party agents; most banks are moving to read-only access; many banks cannot tell an agent the customer sent from one that went rogue. Decide this quarter: block credential-sharing agents or route them to read-only.

Action. Fraud operations: Flag logins showing agent behavior on customer credentials, and write a dispute rule for transfers an agent initiated.

What our records say

Bank of America's AI strategy is described as a step-by-step extension of one assistant, Erica, rather than a big-bang rollout.1 Erica has been extended step by step into employees' tools, treasury products and advisor workflows, funded by a technology budget the bank now puts at $14 billion a year, more than $4.1 billion of it for new initiatives including AI.1

  1. BofA: AI programme summary (part 1)

From our records

Sources

  1. ReportBanks restrict AI agents' access to customer accounts Axios
  2. Also reported byBig Banks Won’t Let Outside AI Agents Move Money PYMNTS