Bank of America · Institution's own AI · severity 4 of 5
On 14 July 2022 the CFPB and the OCC fined Bank of America a combined $225 million ($100m and $125m) over its unemployment-benefit prepaid card program. Per the CFPB, from 28 September 2020 to 8 June 2021 the bank replaced reasonable investigations with an automated "Fraud Filter" using "a simple set of flags": it denied about 188,000 notices of error without further investigation, froze or blocked cardholders' accounts, and retroactively reversed more than 11,000 credits it had already paid. Both orders require redress, which the CFPB estimated at hundreds of millions of dollars. The bank neither admitted nor denied the findings and said states approved the payments amid unprecedented fraud. Regulators did not describe the filter as AI. The OCC terminated its consent order in June 2026.
Record last reviewed Oct 21, 2026 · Markdown
Date
Institution
Country
United States
AI system
Fraud Filter · Automated fraud-detection process (three indicators) applied to prepaid-card notices of error; not described as AI
AI?
Automated system not described as AI
The system was automated, but neither the institution nor a regulator described it as AI; it is listed because it is routinely discussed as an AI failure.
Category
Status
Settled
Severity
4 of 5
Impact
$225 million in civil money penalties ($100m CFPB, $125m OCC), plus redress the CFPB estimated at hundreds of millions of dollars · ≈ $225 million · About 188,000 notices of error denied by the filter nationwide; tens of thousands of California EDD cardholders had accounts frozen; more than 11,000 paid credits reversed · Cardholders went weeks or months without benefits; some faced late fees, missed bills, foreclosure, eviction or car repossession, per the CFPB order. The total redress actually paid has not been published in the sources reviewed.
What happened?
Bank of America held contracts with 12 states, including California, to pay unemployment and other government benefits through prepaid debit cards. As claims and fraud surged during the pandemic, the bank changed how it handled cardholders' notices of error about unauthorized transfers: from 28 September 2020 it ran them only through a newly developed automated Fraud Filter and, for any notice meeting one of the filter's three indicators, "automatically determined that no error had occurred", according to the CFPB consent order.[2][4]
For notices that tripped the filter, the bank also froze the cardholder's prepaid account or, after 17 March 2021, blocked the card. The CFPB found the bank knew or should have known the filter would sometimes reach the wrong answer, quoting an internal September 2020 presentation: "Fraudulent determinations would require a detailed review of specific accounts, which given the volume, is unmanageable." Frozen cardholders went weeks, and in some cases months, without their benefits; some incurred late fees and missed bills, and some faced foreclosure, eviction or car repossession, according to the order.[2]
Between 28 September 2020 and 8 June 2021 the bank used the filter to deny approximately 188,000 notices of error nationwide without further investigation, the CFPB found. In late September or early October 2020 it also applied the filter retroactively to more than 11,000 California (EDD) notices of error it had already investigated and paid, reversing the credits; the CFPB called this an abusive practice. The CFPB's press release said the bank also left consumers on hold for hours and sent them back to an overwhelmed state agency.[1][2]
The OCC separately found unfair or deceptive practices under Section 5 of the FTC Act in the bank's failure to investigate and resolve claims of unauthorized transactions, plus deficiencies in operational processes, risk management and internal controls. Reuters, CNBC, American Banker and Banking Dive reported the $225 million total on the day the orders were announced.[4][7][8][9][10]
When did it happen?
- Sep 28, 2020
Bank of America starts running unemployment-card notices of error only through its new automated Fraud Filter, denying and freezing any that meet one of three indicators.[2]
- Oct 2020
The bank applies the filter retroactively to more than 11,000 already-paid California notices of error and reverses the credits (late September or early October 2020, per the CFPB).[2]
- Jun 8, 2021
The bank stops relying solely on the Fraud Filter; the CFPB counts about 188,000 notices of error denied by it since September 2020.[2]
- Jul 14, 2022
The CFPB ($100m penalty) and the OCC ($125m penalty) issue consent orders requiring redress and program fixes.[1][4][5]
- Jun 11, 2026
The OCC terminates its July 2022 consent order AA-ENF-2022-21 against Bank of America.[6]
What was the impact?
- Financial: $225 million in civil money penalties ($100m CFPB, $125m OCC), plus redress the CFPB estimated at hundreds of millions of dollars · ≈ $225 million[1][2][4]
- Customers: About 188,000 notices of error denied by the filter nationwide; tens of thousands of California EDD cardholders had accounts frozen; more than 11,000 paid credits reversed[1][2][4]
- Other: Cardholders went weeks or months without benefits; some faced late fees, missed bills, foreclosure, eviction or car repossession, per the CFPB order. The total redress actually paid has not been published in the sources reviewed.[1][2][4]
Severity 4 of 5: Rubric 4 (consent orders, many customers): two consent orders with $225m in civil money penalties, after the bank used its automated fraud filter to deny about 188,000 notices of error and froze the accounts of tens of thousands of California cardholders, per the CFPB.
How did Bank of America respond?
Bank of America neither admitted nor denied the findings. Spokesman Bill Halldin said: "Bank of America partnered with our state clients to identify and fight fraud throughout the pandemic. This action arose despite the government's own acknowledgement that the unemployment program expansion during the pandemic created unprecedented criminal activity where illegal applicants were able to get states to approve tens of billions of dollars in payments." The bank told CNBC that the states were responsible for reviewing and approving applications and that it had issued more than $250 billion in pandemic unemployment benefits to more than 14 million people.[7][8][9]
What was the outcome, and did regulators act?
Both orders required Bank of America to repay consumers wrongly denied, make lump-sum consequential-harm payments and offer an individualized review; the OCC's remediation payments also satisfy the CFPB's parallel requirement. The OCC additionally ordered corrective action on risk management, contract review and complaints handling. The OCC terminated its consent order (AA-ENF-2022-21) on 11 June 2026. As of 2026-10-21 the CFPB's action page still lists its order (2022-CFPB-0004) as "Post Order/Post Judgment", with no termination posted.[1][3][4][6]
- CFPB Consent Order against Bank of America, N.A. (Jul 14, 2022, penalty $100 million)
- OCC Consent Order against Bank of America, N.A. (Jul 14, 2022)
- OCC Consent Order + Civil Money Penalty against Bank of America, National Association (Jul 14, 2022, penalty $125 million)
Was Bank of America's unemployment-card fraud filter an AI system?
No regulator described it as AI. The CFPB called it an automated fraud detection process, a "Fraud Filter" using a simple set of flags (three indicators) that automatically denied cardholders' error claims and froze their accounts. It is in this register because it is widely cited as an automated-decisioning failure at a bank.
How many people did Bank of America's fraud filter affect?
Per the CFPB consent order, the filter was used to deny about 188,000 notices of error nationwide between September 2020 and June 2021 without further investigation, tens of thousands of California cardholders had their accounts frozen, and more than 11,000 already-paid credits were reversed retroactively.
Was any money lost, and do customers get it back?
Cardholders were cut off from benefits for weeks or months. Both orders require Bank of America to repay wrongly denied claims, make a lump-sum consequential-harm payment and offer an individualized review; the CFPB estimated the redress at hundreds of millions of dollars. The total actually paid has not been published in the sources reviewed.
Did the regulators act against Bank of America?
Yes. On 14 July 2022 the CFPB imposed a $100 million penalty and the OCC a $125 million penalty, each through a consent order requiring redress and program fixes. The OCC terminated its consent order in June 2026; the CFPB's action page did not show a termination as of October 2026.
- Federal Regulators Fine Bank of America $225 Million Over Botched Disbursement of State Unemployment Benefits at Height of Pandemic official
- Consent Order, In the Matter of Bank of America, N.A., File No. 2022-CFPB-0004 official
- Enforcement action: Bank of America, N.A. (2022-CFPB-0004) official
- OCC Assesses $125 Million Civil Money Penalty Against Bank of America, Orders Restitution for Unfair and Deceptive Practices (NR 2022-84) official
- Consent Order for the Assessment of a Civil Money Penalty, Bank of America, N.A., AA-ENF-2022-22 official
- Order Terminating the Consent Order, Bank of America, N.A., AA-ENF-2026-32 official
- Bank of America fined $225 mln for 'botched' disbursement of jobless benefits during pandemic news
- Bank of America fined $225 million over unemployment benefits program news
- BofA fined $225 million for failing to rein in benefits fraud news
- Bank of America fined $225M over 'botched' disbursement of unemployment benefits news
When AI goes wrong at a bank, the next morning's brief says so.
when one of these regulators moves, the next morning's brief says so · six sourced stories · 7 am PT · free
plus every regulation, bank and agent page update, the morning after · leave any morning