AI vendors and platforms · computed from bank profiles; nothing on this page is written by a model. All ranked answers: /banks/leaders
On the public record as of Oct 28, 2026, 7 of the 141 large banks profiled have a dated, sourced profile entry naming Cohere (a use case, a timeline move, a platform note or a vendor-page customer record). Ranked by entries naming Cohere, the top 5 are RBC (7 entries), TD Bank Group (4 entries), TD (3 entries), City National (3 entries) and CIBC (2 entries). RBC's strongest evidence: North for Banking with Cohere (use case, announced, Dec 3, 2025).
141 banks profiled (120 US, 21 non-US) · 7 with matching evidence · ranked answer, not a comparison
Which of the large banks use Cohere?
| # | Bank | Entries naming Cohere | Strongest entry | Status | Date | On this site | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RBC | 7 | North for Banking with Cohere (use case, announced, Dec 3, 2025) | Announced | Dec 3, 2025 | RBC profile → | Royal Bank of Canada (PR Newswire) ↗ · Royal Bank of Canada (SEC filing) ↗ |
| 2 | TD Bank Group | 4 | Cohere collaboration with Layer 6 (use case, announced, Sep 22, 2026) | Announced | Sep 22, 2026 | TD Bank Group profile → | TD Bank Group (CNW via Yahoo Finance) ↗ |
| 3 | TD | 3 | Cohere collaboration with Layer 6 (use case, announced, Sep 22, 2026) | Announced | Sep 22, 2026 | TD profile → | TD Bank Group (Canada Newswire via Yahoo Finance) ↗ |
| 4 | City National | 3 | RBC Capital Markets AI head describes Aiden's build and partners — Aiden built with NVIDIA and Anthropic and a Cohere-designed interface, deployed to all 8,000 Capital Markets employees (move, May 4, 2026) | Mentioned | May 4, 2026 | City National profile → | FinAi News via ABA ↗ · RBC via PR Newswire ↗ |
| 5 | CIBC | 2 | Multi-model harness over OpenAI and Anthropic models (group) — the top Anthropic model is limited to 150 to 200 staff and Cohere models are tested as a hedge (use case, pilot, Jul 31, 2026) | Pilot | Jul 31, 2026 | CIBC profile → | Financial Post ↗ · Bloomberg ↗ |
| 6 | Commonwealth Bank | 1 | AWS collaboration expanded — the release says AI adoption had doubled to over 2,000 AI models in 2024, describes a CommBiz GenAI messaging service… (move, Feb 5, 2025) | Mentioned | Feb 5, 2025 | Commonwealth Bank profile → | Commonwealth Bank of Australia ↗ |
| 7 | Goldman | 1 | GS AI Assistant reaches about 10,000 employees — answers draw on OpenAI, Google Gemini and Meta Llama models, with Anthropic, Mistral and Cohere under evaluation (move, Jan 21, 2025) | Mentioned | Jan 21, 2025 | Goldman profile → | CNBC ↗ |
Each row quotes one record from bank profiles; the “On this site” link opens the bank's own page or sub-page with every source. Banks absent from the table have nothing matching on the record this site holds.
How is this ranked?
Data: the 141 bank profiles on this site (lib/banks), every entry dated and sourced.
Rule: A bank is listed when at least one use case, timeline move, platform note, section row, number, quote or leader entry on its profile matches the pattern Cohere. Score = number of matching entries. Order: entries, then banks with a matching use case in production, then the newest entry. An entry that only restricts or blocks the vendor's tool is kept, marked "Restricted" and sorted last.
Counts: 7 of 141 profiled banks qualify; 8 distinct sources cited in the table. Data checked 2026-10-28; ranking template updated 2026-10-30.
What are the caveats?
Naming Cohere on the public record is evidence of a relationship, a pilot or a policy, not of contract size or exclusivity; many banks use several providers and do not name them all.
Banks absent from the table have nothing matching on the record this site holds, which is not evidence that they do nothing. Each row links the bank's own page, where every entry carries its sources.
Which bank ranks first?
Royal Bank of Canada leads with 7 entries: North for Banking with Cohere (use case, announced, Dec 3, 2025). TD Bank Group is second with 4.
How many large banks name Cohere in sourced AI records?
7 of the 141 profiled banks (120 US, 21 non-US groups). Among those listed, 4 are US banks and 3 non-US groups.
What counts, and what does not?
A bank is listed when at least one use case, timeline move, platform note, section row, number, quote or leader entry on its profile matches the pattern Cohere. Score = number of matching entries. Order: entries, then banks with a matching use case in production, then the newest entry. An entry that only restricts or blocks the vendor's tool is kept, marked "Restricted" and sorted last. Source: the 141 bank profiles on this site (lib/banks), every entry dated and sourced.
Is this a measure of capability?
No. Every row is a sourced fact on the public record: what the bank, a regulator, a filing or an independent outlet has put on the record. The page does not rate how well anything works.
When was this checked, and how often does it update?
The data behind the table was last checked on 2026-10-28 (bank profiles). The page recomputes whenever that dataset changes and is republished with the site; it is never edited by hand.
When any of these banks moves on AI, you'll read it the next morning.
when one of the banks we cover moves on AI, it is in the next morning's brief · six sourced stories · 7 am PT · free
plus every regulation, bank and agent page update, the morning after · leave any morning