AI vendors and platforms · computed from bank profiles and the Q2 vendor page; nothing on this page is written by a model. All ranked answers: /banks/leaders
On the public record as of Oct 28, 2026, 3 of the 141 large banks profiled have a dated, sourced profile entry naming Q2 (a use case, a timeline move, a platform note or a vendor-page customer record). Ranked by entries naming Q2, the top 3 are Busey Bank (1 entry), Bank of Hope (1 entry) and First Hawaiian (1 entry). Busey Bank's strongest evidence: Glia digital virtual assistant and voice AI replacing the 1-800 IVR — Glia says Busey deployed its digital virtual assistant in 2024, then replaced the touch-tone IVR with Glia Voice… (use case, in production, Sep 24….
141 banks profiled (120 US, 21 non-US) · 3 with matching evidence · ranked answer, not a comparison
Which of the large banks use Q2?
| # | Bank | Entries naming Q2 | Strongest entry | Status | Date | On this site | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Busey Bank | 1 | Glia digital virtual assistant and voice AI replacing the 1-800 IVR — Glia says Busey deployed its digital virtual assistant in 2024, then replaced the touch-tone IVR with Glia Voice… (use case, in production, Sep 24… | In production | Sep 24, 2026 | Busey Bank profile → | Glia (case study) ↗ |
| 2 | Bank of Hope | 1 | Business banking user guides published — ACH payments, information reporting and login guidance on the Q2 platform (move, Sep 29, 2025) | Mentioned | Sep 29, 2025 | Bank of Hope profile → | Bank of Hope ↗ |
| 3 | First Hawaiian | 1 | Q2 PrecisionLender — Relationship pricing and profitability tool with the Andi virtual analyst (vendor description), added to the Q2… (section, Jul 27, 2023) | Mentioned | Jul 27, 2023 | First Hawaiian profile → | Q2 Holdings (Business Wire) ↗ |
Each row quotes one record from bank profiles and the Q2 vendor page; the “On this site” link opens the bank's own page or sub-page with every source. Banks absent from the table have nothing matching on the record this site holds.
How is this ranked?
Data: the 141 bank profiles on this site (lib/banks), every entry dated and sourced, plus the bank customers listed on the Q2 vendor page (/vendors/q2).
Rule: A bank is listed when at least one use case, timeline move, platform note, section row, number, quote or leader entry on its profile matches the pattern Q2 (Holdings|Software|digital|platform|Innovation), or when the vendor page records it as a customer. Score = number of matching entries. Order: entries, then banks with a matching use case in production, then the newest entry. An entry that only restricts or blocks the vendor's tool is kept, marked "Restricted" and sorted last.
Counts: 3 of 141 profiled banks qualify; 3 distinct sources cited in the table. Data checked 2026-10-28; ranking template updated 2026-10-30.
What are the caveats?
Naming Q2 on the public record is evidence of a relationship, a pilot or a policy, not of contract size or exclusivity; many banks use several providers and do not name them all.
Banks absent from the table have nothing matching on the record this site holds, which is not evidence that they do nothing. Each row links the bank's own page, where every entry carries its sources.
Which bank ranks first?
First Busey Corporation leads with 1 entry: Glia digital virtual assistant and voice AI replacing the 1-800 IVR — Glia says Busey deployed its digital virtual assistant in 2024, then replaced the touch-tone IVR with Glia Voice… (use case, in production, Sep 24…. Bank of Hope is second with 1.
How many large banks name Q2 in sourced AI records?
3 of the 141 profiled banks (120 US, 21 non-US groups). Among those listed, 3 are US banks and 0 non-US groups.
What counts, and what does not?
A bank is listed when at least one use case, timeline move, platform note, section row, number, quote or leader entry on its profile matches the pattern Q2 (Holdings|Software|digital|platform|Innovation), or when the vendor page records it as a customer. Score = number of matching entries. Order: entries, then banks with a matching use case in production, then the newest entry. An entry that only restricts or blocks the vendor's tool is kept, marked "Restricted" and sorted last. Source: the 141 bank profiles on this site (lib/banks), every entry dated and sourced, plus the bank customers listed on the Q2 vendor page (/vendors/q2).
Is this a measure of capability?
No. Every row is a sourced fact on the public record: what the bank, a regulator, a filing or an independent outlet has put on the record. The page does not rate how well anything works.
When was this checked, and how often does it update?
The data behind the table was last checked on 2026-10-28 (bank profiles and the Q2 vendor page). The page recomputes whenever that dataset changes and is republished with the site; it is never edited by hand.
When any of these banks moves on AI, you'll read it the next morning.
when one of the banks we cover moves on AI, it is in the next morning's brief · six sourced stories · 7 am PT · free
plus every regulation, bank and agent page update, the morning after · leave any morning