Which large banks use Glia?

Data checked Oct 28, 2026 · 4 of 141 banks qualify · 5 sources cited · template updated Oct 30, 2026

AI vendors and platforms · computed from bank profiles and the Glia vendor page; nothing on this page is written by a model. All ranked answers: /banks/leaders

On the public record as of Oct 28, 2026, 4 of the 141 large banks profiled have a dated, sourced profile entry naming Glia (a use case, a timeline move, a platform note or a vendor-page customer record). Ranked by entries naming Glia, the top 4 are Busey Bank (13 entries), Live Oak (5 entries), Banner Bank (3 entries) and Columbia (2 entries). Busey Bank's strongest evidence: Glia voice-AI virtual assistants in the contact centre (use case, in production, Sep 24, 2026).

141 banks profiled (120 US, 21 non-US) · 4 with matching evidence · ranked answer, not a comparison

Which of the large banks use Glia?

Checked 2026-10-28 · bank profiles and the Glia vendor page
#BankEntries naming GliaStrongest entryStatusDateOn this siteSources
1Busey Bank13Glia voice-AI virtual assistants in the contact centre (use case, in production, Sep 24, 2026)In productionSep 24, 2026Busey Bank profile →The Financial Brand ↗ · Glia (Business Wire) ↗
2Live Oak5Glia Banking AI for customer contact (use case, in production, Oct 8, 2026)In productionOct 8, 2026Live Oak profile →Glia (Business Wire via Yahoo Finance) ↗
3Banner Bank3Glia AI assistants in the client engagement center (use case, in production, Oct 14, 2025)In productionOct 14, 2025Banner Bank profile →Glia ↗
4Columbia2Glia digital service ('Go-To') (use case, in production, Sep 24, 2026)In productionSep 24, 2026Columbia profile →Glia ↗

Each row quotes one record from bank profiles and the Glia vendor page; the “On this site” link opens the bank's own page or sub-page with every source. Banks absent from the table have nothing matching on the record this site holds.

How is this ranked?

Data: the 141 bank profiles on this site (lib/banks), every entry dated and sourced, plus the bank customers listed on the Glia vendor page (/vendors/glia).

Rule: A bank is listed when at least one use case, timeline move, platform note, section row, number, quote or leader entry on its profile matches the pattern Glia, or when the vendor page records it as a customer. Score = number of matching entries. Order: entries, then banks with a matching use case in production, then the newest entry. An entry that only restricts or blocks the vendor's tool is kept, marked "Restricted" and sorted last.

Counts: 4 of 141 profiled banks qualify; 5 distinct sources cited in the table. Data checked 2026-10-28; ranking template updated 2026-10-30.

What are the caveats?

Naming Glia on the public record is evidence of a relationship, a pilot or a policy, not of contract size or exclusivity; many banks use several providers and do not name them all.

Banks absent from the table have nothing matching on the record this site holds, which is not evidence that they do nothing. Each row links the bank's own page, where every entry carries its sources.

Which bank ranks first?

First Busey Corporation leads with 13 entries: Glia voice-AI virtual assistants in the contact centre (use case, in production, Sep 24, 2026). Live Oak is second with 5.

How many large banks name Glia in sourced AI records?

4 of the 141 profiled banks (120 US, 21 non-US groups). Among those listed, 4 are US banks and 0 non-US groups.

What counts, and what does not?

A bank is listed when at least one use case, timeline move, platform note, section row, number, quote or leader entry on its profile matches the pattern Glia, or when the vendor page records it as a customer. Score = number of matching entries. Order: entries, then banks with a matching use case in production, then the newest entry. An entry that only restricts or blocks the vendor's tool is kept, marked "Restricted" and sorted last. Source: the 141 bank profiles on this site (lib/banks), every entry dated and sourced, plus the bank customers listed on the Glia vendor page (/vendors/glia).

Is this a measure of capability?

No. Every row is a sourced fact on the public record: what the bank, a regulator, a filing or an independent outlet has put on the record. The page does not rate how well anything works.

When was this checked, and how often does it update?

The data behind the table was last checked on 2026-10-28 (bank profiles and the Glia vendor page). The page recomputes whenever that dataset changes and is republished with the site; it is never edited by hand.

When any of these banks moves on AI, you'll read it the next morning.

when one of the banks we cover moves on AI, it is in the next morning's brief · six sourced stories · 7 am PT · free

plus every regulation, bank and agent page update, the morning after · leave any morning