On July 26, 2023 the SEC proposed rules (Release 34-97990, File No. S7-12-23) requiring broker-dealers and investment advisers to identify conflicts of interest arising from their use of 'covered technology' — analytical, technological, or computational functions that optimize for, predict, guide, forecast, or direct investment-related behaviors — and to eliminate or neutralize any conflict that placed the firm's interest ahead of investors'. The proposal was published in the Federal Register on August 9, 2023 with comments due October 10, 2023, drew heavy industry opposition, and was formally withdrawn on June 12, 2025.
| Document | SEC Predictive Data Analytics proposal (34-97990) — Conflicts of Interest Associated with the Use of Predictive Data Analytics by Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers — proposed rule |
| Issued by | U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Type | Consultation |
| Status | Withdrawn |
| Published | Jul 26, 2023 |
| Comment deadline | Oct 10, 2023 |
| Applies to | SEC-registered broker-dealers and investment advisers, including bank-affiliated firms, in any 'investor interaction' using a covered technology |
| Superseded by | SEC withdrawal of proposed rules (33-11377) |
| Official source | sec.gov ↗ |
| Use cases | AI governance (general) · Customer-facing chatbots · Trading & capital markets · Model risk management |
What are the key points of SEC Predictive Data Analytics proposal (34-97990)?
- Would have added new Rule 15l-2 under the Exchange Act (broker-dealers) and Rule 211(h)(2)-4 under the Advisers Act (investment advisers).
- 'Covered technology' was defined broadly enough to reach not only AI and machine learning but many conventional analytics, spreadsheets, and behavioral-design features in apps.
- Firms would have had to evaluate any use or reasonably foreseeable potential use of a covered technology in investor interactions, and eliminate or neutralize the effect of conflicts — disclosure alone would not have sufficed.
- Required written policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance, plus books-and-records of each evaluation and determination.
- Chair Gensler framed it as technology-neutral: firms must meet their obligation not to put their own interests first regardless of the tool.
- Comment period ran 60 days from Federal Register publication (August 9, 2023) to October 10, 2023.
What did SEC Predictive Data Analytics proposal (34-97990) change for banks?
It never took effect, but for two years it shaped how bank broker-dealers and advisers inventoried their models and digital-engagement features, because the definition of covered technology would have captured recommendation engines, robo-advice, and even prompts and nudges in mobile apps. Its withdrawal removed the prospect of an 'eliminate or neutralize' standard, leaving firms under the disclosure-and-mitigation framework of Regulation Best Interest and the Advisers Act fiduciary duty.
Is the SEC predictive data analytics rule still pending?
No. The Commission withdrew it on June 12, 2025 along with 13 other proposals and stated it does not intend to issue a final rule; any future action would come as a new proposal.
What was 'covered technology' in the SEC PDA proposal?
Any analytical, technological, or computational function, algorithm, model, correlation matrix, or similar method that optimizes for, predicts, guides, forecasts, or directs investment-related behaviors or outcomes — a definition critics said swept in ordinary spreadsheets and calculators.
| Date | Document | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2025 | SEC withdrawal of proposed rules (33-11377) — Withdrawal of Proposed Regulatory Actions — including the predictive data analytics conflicts proposal | Final |
| Mar 4, 2026 | Atkins remarks at FSOC AI roundtable (Mar 2026) — Remarks at Financial Stability Oversight Council Artificial Intelligence Innovation Series Roundtable on Strategy and Governance Principles | Final |
| Dec 4, 2025 | Investor Advisory Committee AI disclosure recommendation — Recommendation of the SEC Investor Advisory Committee Regarding the Disclosure of Artificial Intelligence's Impact on Operations | Final |
| Nov 17, 2025 | Division of Examinations FY2026 Priorities — Examination Priorities: Fiscal Year 2026 — Division of Examinations | In force |
| Apr 9, 2025 | SEC v. Saniger (Nate, Inc.) — SEC Charges Founder of Nate, Inc. with Fraud Over False Claims About the Company's Use of Artificial Intelligence | Final |
| Jan 14, 2025 | Presto Automation AI-washing order — SEC Charges Restaurant-Technology Company Presto Automation for Misleading Statements About AI Product | Final |
Follow every document these regulators publish
6 curated AI stories for banking executives · Every morning · Free
Subscribe to BankingNewsAI →