On 5 August 2024 the Reserve Bank of India published a draft circular, "Regulatory Principles for Management of Model Risks in Credit", for public comments by 4 September 2024. It would require regulated entities to adopt a Board-approved model risk management policy for credit models, keep a model inventory, obtain Risk Management Committee of the Board approval for each credit model and any change in inputs or assumptions, validate each model independently before deployment and at least yearly, and give the RBI contractual access to evaluate third-party models. As drafted it would apply three months after issuance, with existing models validated within six months. The RBI has not published a final version of this circular; on 24 June 2026 it released a broader draft Guidance on Regulatory Principles for Model Risk Management that refers back to it.
OFFICIAL TEXT: rbi.org.in ↗ · PROPOSED · COMMENT PERIOD CLOSED · RBI
| Document | RBI draft circular on Regulatory Principles for Management of Model Risks in Credit — Regulatory Principles for Management of Model Risks in Credit (draft circular for comments) |
| Issued by | Reserve Bank of India — India's central bank and regulator of banks, non-banking financial companies and other regulated entities (REs) |
| Type | Consultation |
| Status | Proposed · comment period closed |
| Published | Aug 5, 2024 |
| Comment deadline | Sep 4, 2024 |
| Applies to | Commercial banks (including regional rural banks and local area banks), primary (urban) co-operative banks, state and central co-operative banks, NBFCs (including housing finance companies) and all-India financial institutions, for credit risk models used in credit decisions, whether in-house or sourced from third parties. |
| Official source | rbi.org.in ↗ |
| Use cases | Credit scoring & underwriting · Model risk management · Fair lending & discrimination · Third-party & vendor AI · AI governance (general) |
What are the key points of RBI draft circular on Regulatory Principles for Management of Model Risks in Credit?
- Definition (paragraph 1): a credit risk model is any quantitative method that applies statistical, economic, financial or mathematical principles and assumptions to process data into an output used for credit decisions, including credit scoring, borrower selection, loan pricing, risk analysis and loan loss provisions.
- Governance (paragraphs 2 and 3): a detailed Board-approved policy covering the entire model lifecycle, a model inventory of approved models whether in-sourced or outsourced, and RMCB (or designated Board sub-committee) approval of each credit model and of subsequent changes in inputs or assumptions.
- Development and deployment (paragraph 4): defined objectives, robust inputs and assumptions, detailed documentation of output sensitivity, and outcomes that are consistent, unbiased, explainable and verifiable; overrides based on subjective factors must follow the policy and be documented in an auditable format.
- Third-party models (paragraph 5): the same principles apply; contracts must give access to minimum technical documentation, and REs remain ultimately responsible and accountable for the integrity and outcomes of outsourced models.
- Validation (paragraphs 6 to 8): independent validation before deployment, after amendments owing to material events and at least yearly, covering assumptions, data accuracy, regulatory compliance, documentation, back-testing and instances of bias or discrimination; results go to the RMCB.
- Supervisory review (paragraph 9): deployed models are subject to supervisory review, and the RBI may engage external experts to validate models, including external models, with contractual provisions enabling supervisory evaluation.
- Timeline in the draft (paragraph 3 of the covering circular): in force within three months of issuance; new models follow it from then, existing models to be validated within six months.
- Repeal clause: the draft would repeal Chapter 3 (Credit Risk Models) alone of the Guidance Note on Credit Risk Management dated 12 October 2002.
What did RBI draft circular on Regulatory Principles for Management of Model Risks in Credit change for banks?
It proposed binding model risk principles for credit models, aimed at borrower selection, scoring and pricing, and it already required explainable and unbiased outcomes without naming AI. It was overtaken in scope by the June 2026 draft Guidance on Regulatory Principles for Model Risk Management, which covers all models and adds AI/ML principles.
What did the RBI's draft Regulatory Principles for Management of Model Risks in Credit propose for banks?
The RBI's draft circular of 5 August 2024 proposed that regulated entities use a Board-approved policy for the full lifecycle of credit models, keep an inventory of all approved models, whether in-sourced or outsourced, and obtain approval from the Risk Management Committee of the Board for each credit model and any change in its inputs or assumptions. Each model would be independently validated before deployment, after material amendments and at least yearly, with back-testing and review for bias or discrimination, and third-party models would be subject to the same principles with contractual access to documentation and supervisory evaluation. It was published for comment until 4 September 2024, was drafted to apply three months after issuance with existing models validated within six months, and has not been issued in final form; the June 2026 draft Guidance on Regulatory Principles for Model Risk Management is the RBI's later, broader proposal.
| Rule | Authority | What it requires | Applies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paragraph 2 — Board-approved policy and inventory | RBI | Adopt a detailed Board-approved model risk management policy covering the entire lifecycle and maintain an inventory of approved models, insourced or outsourced. | Draft only |
| Paragraph 3 — RMCB approval | RBI | Deploy individual credit models, and make later changes to inputs or assumptions, only with the approval of the Risk Management Committee of the Board or a designated Board sub-committee. | Draft only |
| Paragraph 4(6) and (7) — Explainable, unbiased outcomes and documented overrides | RBI | Model outcomes must be consistent, unbiased, explainable and verifiable, and any subjective override of a model outcome must follow the policy and be documented in an auditable format. | Draft only |
| Paragraph 5 — Third-party models | RBI | Apply the same principles to outsourced and third-party models, secure access to minimum technical documentation by contract, and remain accountable for their integrity and outcomes. | Draft only |
| Paragraph 6 — Independent validation at least yearly | RBI | Validate each model independently before deployment, after amendments owing to material events and at least yearly. | Draft only |
| Paragraph 7 — Content of validation | RBI | Review assumptions, data accuracy, regulatory compliance, documentation and back-tested efficacy, and review limitations including instances of bias or discrimination. | Draft only |
| Paragraph 9 — Supervisory review of models | RBI | Models are subject to supervisory review, and external model arrangements must allow evaluation by RBI officials or experts they engage. | Draft only |
The draft's covering circular would have brought the principles into force within three months of issuance, with existing models validated within six months, and would have repealed Chapter 3 on Credit Risk Models of the 2002 Guidance Note on Credit Risk Management. Neither has happened because the circular was not finalised.
The RBI's press release of 24 June 2026 describes the new draft Guidance as following the 2024 draft and the FREE-AI report, and the new draft's paragraph 64 provides for it to supersede the same Chapter 3 on finalisation. Banks should therefore treat the 2024 text as background and plan against the 2026 draft.
WHAT THIS MEANS IN PRACTICE
- Use the 2024 draft's credit-model checklist (inventory, RMCB approval, annual validation, bias review) as a baseline, since the 2026 draft retains the same architecture for all models.
- Check that credit models sourced from fintech or collaborative lending partners have contractual documentation access and supervisory evaluation rights.
- Document any manual overrides of credit model outcomes in an auditable format.
- Do not treat the 2024 text as binding; follow the final guidance when the RBI issues it.
What was the RBI's 2024 draft on model risks in credit?
A draft circular dated 5 August 2024, "Regulatory Principles for Management of Model Risks in Credit", that proposed Board-approved model risk policies, model inventories, RMCB approval, independent annual validation and supervisory access for credit models used by banks, NBFCs and other regulated entities. Comments were invited by 4 September 2024.
Is the RBI credit model risk circular in force?
Not as a final circular. The RBI published it as a draft for comments and has not issued a final version; its June 2026 draft Guidance on Regulatory Principles for Model Risk Management is the current proposal and covers all models. The draft is itself not yet in force.
Does the 2024 RBI draft mention AI or machine learning?
Not by name. It covers any quantitative method used for credit decisions and says model outcomes must be consistent, unbiased, explainable and verifiable, and that validation should review instances of bias or discrimination. AI/ML-specific principles appear in the June 2026 draft.
What penalties would apply under the RBI's credit model risk draft?
The draft states none. The covering circular says the instructions are issued under Sections 21, 35A and 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, Sections 45JA, 45L and 45M of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, and Sections 30A, 32 and 33 of the National Housing Bank Act, 1987.
| Date | Document | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2026 | RBI draft Guidance on Regulatory Principles for Model Risk Management — Guidance on Regulatory Principles for Model Risk Management, 2026 (draft released for public comments) | Proposed |
| Aug 13, 2025 | RBI FREE-AI framework — Framework for Responsible and Ethical Enablement of Artificial Intelligence (FREE-AI) Committee Report | Final |
| Aug 11, 2026 | Colorado AG proposed ADMT rules — Proposed Automated Decision-Making Technology and Conversational AI Service Rules (Notice of Rulemaking Hearing) | Comment period open |
| Jul 24, 2026 | Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 (Digital Omnibus on AI) — Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as regards the simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI) | In force |
| May 19, 2026 | Draft Commission guidelines on high-risk classification — Draft Commission Guidelines on the classification of high-risk AI systems under Article 6 of the AI Act | Proposed |
| May 14, 2026 | SB 26-189 — Automated Decision-Making Technology Act (repeal and reenactment of the Colorado AI Act) | Final |
Follow every document these regulators publish
when one of these regulators moves, the next morning's brief says so · six sourced stories · 7 am ET · free
plus every tracker, bank and agent page update, the morning after · leave any morning