SB 947, signed by Governor Newsom on September 30, 2026 (Chapter 859, Statutes of 2026) and operative July 1, 2027, adds Part 5.5.5 (Sections 1520–1526.7) to the Labor Code. It bars an employer from relying solely on an ADS to discipline or terminate an employee; where an employer primarily relies on an ADS output for such a decision, a human must corroborate it with supporting information (supervisory evaluations, personnel files, work product, peer reviews), and the employer must give the employee a written postuse notice and, on request, a description of the employee's own data the ADS used. It is the first US law of its kind. The Labor Commissioner or a public prosecutor enforces it, with a $500 civil penalty per violation; there is no general private right of action.
OFFICIAL TEXT: leginfo.legislature.ca.gov ↗ · FINAL · APPLIES FROM JUL 1, 2027 · CALIFORNIA CPPA
| Document | SB 947 — Employment: Automated Decision Systems (No Robo Bosses Act) |
| Issued by | California — Privacy Protection Agency (CCPA/CPRA automated decisionmaking, risk-assessment and cybersecurity-audit regulations), Attorney General, and Civil Rights Council |
| Type | Statute |
| Status | Final · applies from Jul 1, 2027 |
| Published | Sep 30, 2026 |
| Effective | Jul 1, 2027 |
| Applies to | Any California employer — including banks and credit unions — that uses an automated decision system (ADS) to make or assist disciplinary or termination decisions about employees |
| Official source | leginfo.legislature.ca.gov ↗ |
| Use cases | AI governance (general) · Data & privacy |
What are the key points of SB 947?
- First US statute to directly restrict employers' use of automated decision systems for discipline and termination
- An employer may not rely solely on an ADS to make a disciplinary or termination decision, and may not use an ADS to infer protected status or retaliate against an employee for exercising legal rights
- Where an employer primarily relies on an ADS output for such a decision, a human must corroborate it using the underlying data or other supporting information (supervisory/managerial evaluations, personnel files, work product, peer reviews, witness interviews); if it cannot be corroborated, or the reviewer finds the output inaccurate or misleading, the ADS output cannot be used
- Affected employees may request, and the employer must provide, a meaningful description of the employee's own data used by the ADS, and a written postuse notice confirming human corroboration and the employee's rights
- Anti-retaliation protection for employees who exercise rights, file complaints, or cooperate with an investigation under the Act
- Enforced by the Labor Commissioner or a public prosecutor; civil penalty of $500 per violation; a business already subject to CPPA ADMT regulations must still comply with those regulations in addition to this Act
- Exempts automated decision systems required for national-airspace aircraft development or national-security/military/defense purposes, and parties under a qualifying collective bargaining agreement that expressly waives the Act's provisions
- Operative July 1, 2027 — six months after the governor's October 2025 veto of an earlier, broader version of this bill
What did SB 947 change for banks?
California adds an employment-specific AI statute alongside its existing Civil Rights Council ADS regulations and CPPA ADMT rules, narrowing in on the single highest-stakes employment use case — AI-assisted discipline and termination — and requiring documented human corroboration rather than leaving it to risk-based ADMT notice-and-opt-out obligations alone. For bank HR functions using AI-assisted performance or conduct tools, this adds a standalone corroboration-and-notice duty that applies regardless of whether the CPPA's significant-decision ADMT rules are also triggered.
Does SB 947 ban AI from being used in termination decisions?
No. It bans relying solely on an automated decision system for a disciplinary or termination decision. Where the employer primarily relies on the ADS output, a human must corroborate it with other supporting information before the decision is finalized.
When does SB 947 take effect?
July 1, 2027. It was signed September 30, 2026 as Chapter 859, Statutes of 2026, reversing the Governor's October 2025 veto of an earlier version of the bill.
Can an employee sue under SB 947?
Not directly. The Act is enforced by the Labor Commissioner or a public prosecutor, with a $500 civil penalty per violation; employees do have a protected right to request a description of their own ADS-used data and are protected from retaliation for asserting rights under the Act.
| Date | Document | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2026 | AB 1609 — Customer Service Chatbots (Right to Human Customer Service Act) | Final |
| Sep 22, 2025 | CPPA ADMT, risk-assessment and cybersecurity-audit regulations — CCPA Updates, Cybersecurity Audits, Risk Assessments, Automated Decisionmaking Technology, and Insurance Companies — approved regulation text (11 CCR Division 6) | In force |
| Jun 27, 2025 | Civil Rights Council ADS employment regulations — Modifications to Employment Regulations Regarding Automated-Decision Systems (Fair Employment and Housing Act regulations, 2 CCR) | In force |
| Jan 13, 2025 | California AG legal advisory on AI (Jan 2025) — Legal Advisory: Application of Existing California Laws to Artificial Intelligence | Final |
| Jun 28, 2018 | Cal. Civ. Code §1798.145 (CCPA exemptions, incl. GLBA data) — California Consumer Privacy Act — exemptions, including the data-level exemption for information subject to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the California Financial Information Privacy Act (Civil Code §1798.145) | In force |
| Sep 30, 2026 | Bailey: Frontier AI and the Question of Governance (Sep 2026) — Frontier AI and the Question of Governance — Governor Andrew Bailey | Final |
Follow every document these regulators publish
when one of these regulators moves, the next morning's brief says so · six sourced stories · 7 am ET · free
plus every tracker, bank and agent page update, the morning after · leave any morning